Site icon LucidQuest Ventures

Virtual clinical trials – Can this be the new normal?

With the high severity and more significant contagion effect, this pandemic has already negatively impacted the current ecosystem of clinical trials as a whole. The eligibility and ability of participants to enter in clinical trials is affected as visits are constrained by quarantine measures and travel restrictions. 

While the concept of virtual trial is not new and dates back to 2011, when Pfizer conducted the first ever randomized clinical study that managed participants using mobile phones and the internet, the approach towards virtual mode of conducting clinical trials had faded away. This was partly due to limited success stories and high capital investments required for technological infrastructure to deliver such trials. However, with COVID-19 delivering a punch in the face of on-going and planned studies, the future of decentralised (remote or virtual) clinical trials has rapidly become imperative.

Where the average cost of developing a drug and bringing it to the market can be estimated to be as high as $2.6 billion (two-thirds of the cost going to clinical trials), about 90% of them fail. The advantages of these virtual trials are not limited to cost savings but: 

With advantages, however, also come some barriers and virtual clinical trials are no exception and hence regardless of these potential benefits, of the >90,000 active clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (as at Nov 2020), only 55 digital efficacy endpoints are currently being used in industry-sponsored trials of new medical products. The various reasons to this barrier can be: 

These disadvantages / barriers of adopting virtual clinical trials however are being looked at under a different light now. Due to stay-at-home orders and fears of COVID-19 transmission, more than 1,500 clinical trials across the U.S. and Europe have been disrupted since May 2020. This can take a toll on R&D costs, patients’ lives etc. 

A decentralized clinical trial model is therefore likely to be the new normal for a large number of trials but not necessarily a complete alternative to the traditional on site mode. The virtual model might still not be a good fit for Phase I trials, which focus on patient safety, or trials that treat acute health problems like stroke, or those that require complicated measurements, like a brain scan or MRI. 

The above boil down to the fact that Pharma companies need to be prepared to adopt the new normal without saying, “we can’t” but “how can we do it”. Inevitably, this new normal calls for: 

 

Sources: 

https://www.veristat.com/virtual-clinical-trial-adoption

https://www.clinicalleader.com/doc/steps-to-get-a-virtual-clinical-trial-up-and-running-0001

https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/virtual-clinical-trials-post-covid-19-collaboration-will-be-key-to-success

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/25/virtual-clinical-trials-being-used-for-drug-development-during-crisis.html

https://www.volitioncapital.com/news/virtual-clinical-trials-the-future-of-healthcare-research/

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41573-020-00094-0

#virtualtrials #covid19 #decentralizedtrials #clinicaltrials

Exit mobile version